A short study exploring how we respond to frustration online.
Takes about 3 minutes.
We're going to show you a common online situation. There's no right or wrong response β we're interested in your honest reaction.
Before we show you another situation, we'd like to hear about something that has been frustrating you online lately β anything at all. This is just between you and the AI. Your conversation is not stored.
Same question as before β what would you most likely do?
Your responses have been recorded. Here's a little more about what this study is exploring.
Neuroscientist Lisa Feldman Barrett (2020) argues that the nervous system is partly regulated by the people around us β their presence, responsiveness, and predictability directly affect how we feel and how we're likely to act. Online environments strip that away. Anonymity removes the social cost of hostile expression, and without other people present to co-regulate us, frustration travels more directly toward aggression.
In research data from 173 Irish university students (McCaffrey, 2026), participants who used AI to vent frustration showed a significantly lower likelihood of hostile online responding β even after controlling for other predictors. Crucially, the effect was specific to venting. Other forms of AI use showed no relationship at all.
Taca is exploring whether a responsive AI can partially restore the regulatory function that online anonymity removes β functioning not just as a tool, but as a new kind of social participant. Your responses contribute to the next phase of that research.